本帖最后由 音乐之贼 于 2020-10-9 07:25 编辑
https://www.youraudiosolutions.com/interview-articles/ethan-winer-busting-audio-myths-and-why-dave-pensado-was-tricked
他的文章不知道你能打开不，我这边没问题，截取他的一段话。
HIGH DEFINITION AUDIO, IS 96 KHZ BETTER THAN 48 KHZ?No, I think this is one of the biggest scam perpetuating on everybody in audio. Not just people making music but also people who listen to music and buys it. When this is tested properly nobody can tell the difference between 44.1 kHz and higher. People think they can hear the difference because they do an informal test. They play a recording at 96 kHz and then play a different recording from, for example, a CD. One recording sounds better than the other so they say it must be the 96 kHz one but of course, it has nothing to do with that.
他的标题是高码率音频，96KHZ比48KHZ好么，然后文章里面写的是不停说44.1采样率和CD？其实比较下48KHZ和384KHZ才更有意义。但这个作者只强调96KHZ和CD去比，呵呵了。很多解码器解码96KHZ还真不如高级CD机安定稳当。这个作者有故意设置陷阱之举。
其实日常中SACD取样比CD高，听感上的差异非常明显，SACD整体氛围，空气感细节声场细节都更好。
回复的人都看不过去了，第二个基本是爆粗口。
It just comes down to a well built piece of gear or cable. No matter cost. If an $800 interface uses good materials and is well built it will sound as clean as a $ 3000 interface. As he said with the $20 cable, wire was good and soldered well, sounds good. Resistance may be different but will perform as expected.
I have been guilty of wanting/needing to hear a difference because I spent good money. The reality was zero difference. Kinda like putting different color marker on the edge of a cd, red us brighter, black is warmer, sure it is. Lol .
You really lost my trust when you said summing mixers are pointless. Even my ditsy girlfriends jaw dropped when she heard three difference. The mix is way bigger more open louder and impactful. This article would have stopped. me from achieving the sound I have now had I read it before buying the dangerous 2 bus +
| 
楼主: lljjdd
粤公网安备 44030602000598号 耳机大家坛、www.erji.net、网站LOGO图形均为注册商标 
IP卡
狗仔卡
发表于 2020-10-9 05:30
显身卡
