这篇文章之前没看到过，真是挺好的，收藏了，赞！
http://digistar.cl/Forum/viewtopic.php?t=442&_sm_nck=1
关于这事，我原来也问过一圈，想过回复如下，也供了解吧。
Quested的回复是：
So the recommendation is based on monitors with a wide dispersion that is typical of soft dome HF and mid drivers. This is something we have found over years of designing and working with systems that the sounds stage becomes more stable and defined. This when used in the equilateral triangle format we find brings the best experience with wide dispersion monitors.
Genelec R&D的回复是：
Several suggestions like this are floating in the Internet. The principle is that of the equilateral triangle for standard stereo. Equilateral triangle here suggests that the distance from the monitors to the listener is equal to the distance (of the monitor centre lines) between the monitors. This creates the sound stage with correct virtual image locations. In addition, the monitors should be aimed directly at the listening position. The suggestions that the monitors are aimed behind or in the front of the listener are usually suggestions for the products that present the flattest frequency response slightly off-axis. When this is the case, the suggestion of the video makes sense. For each monitor/manufacturer, it is advisable to follow the manufacturer’s recommendations for this. Genelec recommends aiming speakers directly at the listener as this ensures the best flatness of the frequency response and the largest area of flat frequency response around the ideal listening position.
acousticfields的Dennis回复：
There are two sound fields to be concerned about. One is the equilateral triangle set up. Let's call this a near field set up.
A few feet behind that position is more of a far field listening. Both have their pros and cons.
btw，能这样交流，分享学习进步，真的太开心了，哈哈哈
|
粤公网安备 44030602000598号 耳机大家坛、www.erji.net、网站LOGO图形均为注册商标 
IP卡
狗仔卡
发表于 2021-12-6 18:40
显身卡